Dear Prime Minister,

2006 International Aid Donated

COUNTRY

Aid as % of income

How close to the
0.7% goal

Sweden

1.03

Already reached goal

Luxembourg

0.89

Already reached goal

Norway

0.89

Already reached goal

Netherlands

0.81

Already reached goal

Denmark

0.80

Already reached goal

Ireland

0.53

Scheduled for 2012

United Kingdom

0.52

Scheduled for 2013

Belgium

0.50

Scheduled for 2010

Austria

0.48

Scheduled for 2015

France

0.47

Scheduled for 2012

Switzerland

0.39

No schedule yet

Finland

0.39

Scheduled for 2010

Germany

0.36

Scheduled for 2014

Spain

0.32

Scheduled for 2012

Canada

0.30

No schedule yet

Australia

0.30

No schedule yet

New Zealand

0.27

No schedule yet

Japan

0.25

No schedule yet

Portugal

0.21

Scheduled for 2015

Italy

0.20

Scheduled for 2015

United States

0.17

No schedule yet

Greece

0.16

Scheduled for 2015

I am a student who just recently immigrated to the USA. Despite my fancy new residency (and quite sparkly visa in my passport) I am still quite patriotic and rather concerned as to Canada’s role in wellbeing of society. It’s been brought to my attention that Canada is eighth to the bottom of preventable deaths that occur every day from hunger and poverty-related diseases. Eighth to the bottom of what, you say? International aid of course.

So what’s up? How come my country is not honouring the agreement it made and signed at the 2002 Monterrey Conference and once again at the 2002 Johannesburg Summit? We are supposed to be making a concrete effort towards giving 0.7% of our national income in aid to poor countries. Perhaps I’m being naïve, but that really doesn’t seem much to ask.

If all 22 countries make this 0.7% goal, it is estimated that the resulting hundred ninety-five billion dollars each year will be enough to effectively combat— and essentially abolish— extreme poverty on our planet.

Honestly, I have paraphrased most of the above information from generic letter located on poverty.com (so assuming you read your own letters, you might recognize it). In my defense, I thought personalising it into my own words would give it a more authentic feel, not to mention it was a good source of statistics and facts.

I understand that you and the rest of our government have a lot of important things to worry about. Canada is a big country, after all. But it’s important to realise that abolishing poverty won’t just help destitute individuals in distant countries. It will also aid our nation in numerous ways– because poverty affects everyone. Not only would we be raising the general quality of life, I suspect by at least reducing poverty we will dually be reducing crime. Clearly humans are flawed by nature so no, I don’t have any pie in the sky ideas that we will become the perfect Utopia, but in the very least we can heighten security. Having nothing makes you desperate, wild with the wonder of where you will get your next meal or source of shelter.

Looking back over the letter, perhaps I got a little too informal at the end. Maybe you get letters like this all the time. Who knows? But again, perhaps that makes it all the more authentic. I don’t understand politicians and I don’t pretend to. Much thanks to whoever took the time to read this and I just desperately hope society keeps continuing to better itself. We’ll never be perfection, but damn it we can try.

Sincerely,
Kaija A. Thom

Leave a Reply